[Kde-scm-interest] [Proposal] Package splitting with thin meta-repos

[Daniel Johnson]

On Friday 29 January 2010 17:54:28 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > 2010/1/29 ComputerDruid <computerdruid at gmail.com>:
> > > So basically I'm missing what action you need to do across the whole
> > > of KDE that isn't a "get everything" or "update everything".
> 
> this statement doesn't give the impression that you read the rest of this
> and other recent threads on this list ...

I have, but that doesn't mean I remember, or that I associated it with this. 
It wouldn't hurt to give an example.

> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 07:12:27PM +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> > As I said before, IMHO the need for something like 'svn externals'
> > should be fulfilled in git (i. e. adding a new subcommand to the git
> > suite, not creating our own command).
> 
> ack
> 
> in particular, the idea to make a simple replacement is incredibly
> naive. such things don't stay simple. ever.

I'm afraid of this, but I still believe it's possible that the community could 
realize the need to keep it the same and do so. This plan does depend on that, 
though.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-scm-interest/attachments/20100129/f9cf56e2/attachment.sig