[Kde-scm-interest] Have we arrived to a dead end?

[Riccardo Iaconelli]

On Saturday 13 February 2010 21:35:22 Thiago Macieira wrote:
>   Em Sábado 13. Fevereiro 2010, às 20.15.41, Riccardo Iaconelli escreveu:
> > Thiago (I'm addressing you directly because you seem to be the one who
> > best  knows all git internals, but others feel free to chime in), do you
> > have a list of requirements that a person working on git hired by KDE
> > would need to implement? This seems to be the only solution that would
> > bring us somewhere, as this thread shows...
> 
> No, I have no such list.
> 
> The only thing I find missing is copy-with-history, which I can do
> manually, on  an case-by-case basis.
> 
> Since I don't think splitting repositories is the way to go, I didn't pay 
> attention to the list of requirements from Oswald.

Ok, that's perfect!
If we can do it manually, and it's not a very widely used feature, then I 
think we can go on and we're not stuck like the last threads seem to imply.

Oswald, your proposal to split repos seems to be a technically impossible 
solution, and which (at least to me) doesn't bring any serious advantages over 
the other one. I suggest we just move on with the old non-splitting plan.

Bye,
-Riccardo
-- 
Pace Peace Paix Paz Frieden Pax Pokój Friður Fred Béke 和平
Hasiti Lapé Hetep Malu Mир Wolakota Santiphap Irini Peoch שלום
Shanti Vrede Baris Rój Mír Taika Rongo Sulh Mir Py'guapy 평화