[Kde-scm-interest] Have we arrived to a dead end?

[Thiago Macieira]

Em Sábado 13. Fevereiro 2010, às 14.14.36, Oswald Buddenhagen escreveu:
> > Otherwise you'd end up requiring that you can only push to one server.
> 
> that's a completely acceptable requirement, wouldn't you think?

No.

Imagine the case that Gitorious needs to do load-balancing servers. Imagine 
the case that someone is using a repository somewhere else while working in a 
branch.

What's the point in a distributed VCS that needs to talk to one specific 
server?

Anyway, the point being: unless it's distributed, the Git community will not 
accept the patch.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
  Senior Product Manager - Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks
      PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
      E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C  966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-scm-interest/attachments/20100213/d93ce559/attachment.sig