[Kde-scm-interest] Have we arrived to a dead end?

Thiago Macieira thiago at kde.org
Fri Feb 12 23:19:29 CET 2010


Em Sexta-feira 12. Fevereiro 2010, às 19.05.51, Oswald Buddenhagen escreveu:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:35:47PM +0100, Riccardo Iaconelli wrote:
> > Hire someone to make a better git?
> 
> i actually like that idea as well.
> the central requirement is having "something like svn externals". one
> thing is truly transparent submodule handling, including atomicity (real
> or something close to it). the second use case would be sharing cmake
> function libraries without having to say "you need to install
> kdegames-cmake so that kpat can tell you what's missing".

Atomicity and multiple repositories is impossible. Forget it.

Choose one or the other.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
  Senior Product Manager - Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks
      PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
      E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C  966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-scm-interest/attachments/20100212/28356010/attachment.sig 


More information about the Kde-scm-interest mailing list