[Kde-scm-interest] Re: kdegraphics libs migration

[Albert Astals Cid]

A Dimecres, 29 de desembre de 2010, Riccardo Iaconelli va escriure:
> On Monday 27 December 2010 23:48:17 Marcel Wiesweg wrote:
> > Well, we went for a non-split repo with digikam et al and the answer from
> > sysadmins was pretty clear (monolithic a no-go).
> 
> I'm sorry to intrude in this discussion, but did you get this message from
> the paper that sysadmins wrote or from other discussions? (private or on
> the mailinglists...)
> 
> Because AFAIK the decision was to let every module to decide what's best
> for them, and I think that, precisely for the reasons that Albert states,
> you should be encouraged to keep a big repositories with all the
> application that need/want to be in there. Other repositories are doing
> that too! And there is always the possibility to split, later, if there
> are some problems.

The problem is that they want kdegraphics/libs to be inside the "digikam" 
repo. That's what is a no go.

Albert