[Kde-scm-interest] accountability
Resul Cetin
Resul-Cetin at gmx.net
Thu Nov 19 01:34:26 CET 2009
Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Em Quarta-feira 18. Novembro 2009, às 12.58.15, Jeff Mitchell escreveu:
> > Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > Em Quarta-feira 18. Novembro 2009, às 07.31.50, Riccardo Iaconelli
>
> escreveu:
> > >> Mmh... but this is a problem also with SVN, no?
> > >
> > > No. In SVN, if you commit, you're the author.
> >
> > And in Git, if you merge someone else's code, you're the "author" too.
>
> Well, no.
>
> $ git log --pretty=fuller --committer=David\ Faure -n1 | cat
> commit 3cb304990f81799e6811b699b6b6ad1c32ec1107
> Author: David Faure <faure at kde.org>
> AuthorDate: Fri May 29 16:36:15 2009 +0200
> Commit: David Faure <faure at kde.org>
> CommitDate: Fri May 29 16:36:15 2009 +0200
>
> Fix compilation with -pedantic
>
> This is Qt. David has no push rights.
>
> Yet he's both author and committer. The question is: who introduced his
> commit to Qt?
>
> The repository is public. You have the SHA-1. The answer to my question
> then is left as an exercise for the reader.
Isn't that stored by gitorious? Just look at http://qt.gitorious.org/qt and
you see many things like "blablub pushed xyz". So the data is right there (the
interface to must be changed to be real useful for you, but gitorious has that
data). The current display seems to be proken somehow so it isn't possible to
say who pushed that specific commit, but I can tell it for many other pushes.
So for example Qt by Nokia is used to push commits made by Martin Jones. This
enough data to know who is to blame for that specific commit to the master
repo. Maybe gitorious must contacted to know why
3cb304990f81799e6811b699b6b6ad1c32ec1107 is only shown as commit and not as
part of a push and if the data is real available.
Best regards,
Resul
More information about the Kde-scm-interest
mailing list