[Kde-scm-interest] accountability

[Jeff Mitchell]

Thomas Zander wrote:
> On Saturday 14. November 2009 22.23.22 Chani wrote:
>> I still don't understand why we need access to email addresses from some
>> gitorious database anyways. 
> 
> I don't know if we do, Johan said that this is not really a solution anyway. 
> Thats why I put up 2 usecases which will be solution independent.

We don't -- my point wasn't to argue that we need it, but rather to
demonstrate why something as seemingly "public" as an email address
could in fact pose privacy problems.

FWIW, I like argonel's idea. I can see how some might not, though.

--Jeff

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-scm-interest/attachments/20091114/b991e38c/attachment.sig