[Kde-scm-interest] Meeting minutes

[Jeremy Whiting]

On Thursday 12 November 2009 3:56:41 pm Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Em Quinta-feira 12. Novembro 2009, às 21.08.50, Albert Astals Cid escreveu:
> > AFAIK pre-commit are
> >  acltest.pl: ACL, can possibly be done with gitorious admininstraion
> 
> IIRC, there are two ACLs of relevance:
>  kde-www -> can be solved by usual Gitorious repository administration

Also, last I heard kde-www wasn't moving to gitorious, but staying in svn.  
Anyone have strong feelings for/against this?

> 
>  kdelibs's SSL certificates -> how many people even know that there's a
> limitation for this? It's to prevent backdoors being introduced. This could
>  be done with a post-commit hook screaming aloud, though.
> 
> >  pre-commit.pl: not sure what it does, seems like making sure you don't
> >  commit things with conflict markers
> 
> Unnecessary with Git. Even though with SVN you still needed to do "svn
> resolved" and people still managed to commit conflict markers...
> 
> >  test-docbook.pl: checks people don't screw up when commiting to
> > kdelibs/kdoctools/docbook
> 
> I don't know about this one.
> 
> >  test-eol-style.pl: checks eol is correct
> 
> Hmm... should be unnecessary too, but WIndows somehow manages to come back
>  and bite us.
> 
> Basically, every file should be committed with LF only. No CRLF file, ever
>  (or we need a .gitattributes file and checking that in a push hook won't
>  be easy).
> 
> >  test-pofiles.pl: checks po files are valid
> >
> > If we don't move translations we don't need test-pofiles.pl
> 
> Yep.
>