[Kde-scm-interest] A concept for "moving to Git" and translations

Ian Monroe ian.monroe at gmail.com
Fri May 29 03:46:05 CEST 2009


On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Albert Astals Cid <aacid at kde.org> wrote:
> A Divendres, 29 de maig de 2009, Thomas Zander va escriure:
>> On Friday 29. May 2009 00.34.47 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
>> > Well, everyone keeps saying "We are loosing developers because of SVN",
>> > can't I extend that to "We are loosing developers because of
>> > CURRENT_VCS"?
>>
>> only if CURENT_VCS equals svn.  What is your point?
>
> My point is that i don't see why "We are loosing developers because of SVN" is
> ok and "We are loosing developers because of git" is not ok now or in 3 years

You've entirely lost me here.

> and why we should not make the scripty system vcs agnostic now that we have
> the 'chance'.

Well decoupling parts of scripty from the VCS details is probably good
design, just don't think it should be a feature goal.

> P.S: I know git is the r00lz and will never be anything better than it but
> there are some of us (stubborn in thiago notation) that still don't like it

That's a pretty horrible reason to support multiple VCS's for the same
project though.

Ian


More information about the Kde-scm-interest mailing list