[Kde-scm-interest] initial port of scripty to git is ready

[Albert Astals Cid]

A Dijous, 21 de maig de 2009, vàreu escriure:
> A Dijous, 21 de maig de 2009, Matt Rogers va escriure:
> > On May 21, 2009, at 8:16 AM, Ian Monroe wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Matt Rogers <mattr at kde.org> wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I've finished an initial port of scripty to git. It can found on
> > >> Gitorious at http://gitorious.org/scripty. There are several issues,
> > >> if you want to call them that, with it:
> > >>
> > >> 1. completely untested
> > >
> > > pinotree says they only way they test is very carefully with the real
> > > scripty. This makes me sad. Maybe we could get an anonsvn server
> > > cloned and made writable, then we could have something to test with.
> > >
> > >> 2. there is no initial git clone to get a working copy if it is
> > >> missing since I don't know what the layout of the new git
> > >> repositories
> > >> is going to look like.
> > >> 3. There is no 'git push' back into the main repository from
> > >> scripty's
> > >> clone
> > >
> > > So that we're on the same page... scripty still needs to work with
> > > i18n in SVN. I was a little concerned when you said its a "git port"
> > > when its really more of a "git feature addition." I guess I should've
> > > dented immediately. :)
> > >
> > > The idea is that for Amarok or Plasma to switch to git tomorrow, i18n
> > > needs to stay in SVN. (Possibly i18n could stay in SVN forever, they
> > > have a very different way of doing things and switching to git should
> > > be up to them.)
> > >
> > > The only thing that needs to be git pushed are the .desktop files that
> > > scripty famously commits in our SVN repos routinely at the moment.
> > >
> > > Ian
> >
> > *sigh* brilliant. too bad nobody told me this initially when i said i
> > would do it.
>
> So i am nobody now? I clearly remember telling you yesterday afternoon
> (european time) that what you were doing was no OK and you ignored me.
>
> Now don't say nobody warned you, say you choose to ignore the i18n
> maintainer because it did not fit in what you wanted to do.

Ok, scrap that, at the end it seems that while in my mind i had clearly state 
that the english my mind had created was totally different and Matt did not 
understand what i wanted to say.

Albert

>
> Albert
>
> > Is there anything else I should know before I keep working on this? Or
> > should I give up now and just let it go back to bitrotting?
> > --
> > Matt
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Kde-scm-interest mailing list
> > Kde-scm-interest at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest