[Kde-scm-interest] atomicity, again

[Thomas Zander]

On Monday 15. June 2009 21.11.50 Thomas Capricelli wrote:
> I remember that one of the requirements that both git and mercurial could
> not fulfill 'easily' was atomicity of commits across several repositories

And no tool we every used so far had this feature, so its not really a 
requirement. More a "may be nice to have".
Though I could see how its actually more hassle than its worth to many.
-- 
Thomas Zander