[Kde-scm-interest] Amarok move to git broke scripty

Jeff Mitchell mitchell at kde.org
Tue Jul 21 01:16:15 CEST 2009


Ian Monroe wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Albert Astals Cid<aacid at kde.org> wrote:
>> A Dimarts, 21 de juliol de 2009, Ian Monroe va escriure:
>>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Albert Astals Cid<aacid at kde.org> wrote:
>>>> Why? Aren't we supposed to have the proper tools to avoid that?
>>>>
>>>> ftp://l10n.kde.org/logs/090720.trunk_l10n-kde4
>>>>
>>>> Ok, it really didn't break but the error message about can't commit is
>>>> quite ugly.
>>>>
>>>> Albert
>>> Yea someone needs to tell scripty to use the Git repo instead if it
>>> isn't already. I really didn't know who to ask to do this.
>> Why wasn't this done before the switch?
>>
>> I mean i've stated around like hundreds of times i'm the i18n maintainer and
>> there is a i18n mailing list, there's no message about you needing help in
>> none of the mailboxes.
> 
> Yep your 100% correct. I apologize.

Albert, this is the first KDE git transition and we're still figuring
out what needs to be done to make it smooth. You are right, we should
have sent warning, we just were thinking of many other things that had
to be done too that aren't in place yet (and many of which also got
forgotten). I think as things progress it'll be a very systematic switch
method that will always include such a ping to you guys.

> 
>>> And perhaps scripty isn't able to deal with a read-only directory? It
>>> might need to be deleted instead I suppose.
>> From a architectural pov i'd prefer it to me deleted/moved otherwise people
>> will still think it's the primary place for development.
> 
> Well this makes sense to me too. I'm not sure why it was decided to be
> made read only instead, probably just in-case there was a need to make
> it writable for some hours again if the transition screwed up (which
> happened).

Yes, this was why. Since things seem to be working I believe we can now
ask them to delete the path (perhaps archiving it in branches/ somewhere
first). Does anyone know any reason to wait?

--Jeff

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-scm-interest/attachments/20090720/6c77b26d/attachment-0001.sig 


More information about the Kde-scm-interest mailing list