[Kde-scm-interest] On Amarok Switching to Git

[Johannes Sixt]

Thiago Macieira schrieb:
> But the important difference would not be the master branches, it would be 
> the stable ones. The KDE repository of Phonon would have the branches that 
> are released with KDE (4.0, 4.2 and 4.3 today), whereas the QtSW one would 
> contain the branches that Qt releases with (4.1 and 4.4 in a month).
> 
> However, if we introduce Continuous Integration for Phonon in Qt, then we 
> can't just merge commits from the KDE repo: those commits have to pass 
> regression testing before being allowed in.

IOW, KDE's Phonon development is ahead of Qt's. Right? That is:

- If everything is OK, then Qt's Phonon is a proper subset of KDE's.

- But if QtSW finds a regression in the version that it intends to
release, then it makes a fixup commit, that KDE would eventually have to
merge in.

-- Hannes