[Kde-scm-interest] On Amarok Switching to Git
Thiago Macieira
thiago at kde.org
Mon Jan 19 13:31:43 CET 2009
Em Segunda-feira 19 Janeiro 2009, às 13:09:02, Johannes Sixt escreveu:
> Thiago Macieira schrieb:
> > Like I said, it's a social problem.
> >
> > That's the way we've worked for 12 years and we see no reason to change
> > just because we're changing SCM.
> >
> > Now, if we decide that it is a good thing to do, it might be a good
> > opportunity to do it while we change SCMs. But that's changing for a
> > whole different reason.
>
> What other reason would there be?
>
> We had the exact same discussion already in the past:
> http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-scm-interest/2007-November/000118.html
>
> Did something change since then? ;)
No, nothing changed. See my reply to that message:
"I simply do not see a way of KDE having restricted repositories, at least not
if we want to have a smooth transition any time soon. The social trust
network model will not work in KDE since we've been for 10 years allowing
anyone to commit anywhere."
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
Senior Software Engineer - Nokia, Qt Software
Qt Software is hiring - ask me
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-scm-interest/attachments/20090119/7a901c0d/attachment.sig
More information about the Kde-scm-interest
mailing list