[Kde-scm-interest] the permissions confusion

[Jeff Mitchell]

Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 03:32:23PM +0100, Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
>> On Saturday 12 December 2009 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
>>> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 10:31:26AM +0100, Thomas Zander wrote:
>>>> b) we want all devs to be able to commit to any kde-developers owned repo
>>>> and
>>> mostly. and don't start denying the existence of the svn acl now ...
>> Wouldn't the special cases like the www part of SVN (are there others?) just 
>> be a separate repository not owned by kde-developers?
>>
> we're talking about whole-repo permissions (which translates to group
> memberships) all the time. ;)

I don't see how this has changed. Create, for instance, +kde-www-developers.

--Jeff

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-scm-interest/attachments/20091212/c790fd1b/attachment.sig