[Kde-scm-interest] meeting summary

[Jeff Mitchell]

On 12/11/2009 3:12 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 03:04:38PM -0500, Jeff Mitchell wrote:
>> On 12/11/2009 2:59 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
>>> no. being a reviewer who may ack patches is a higher privilege than
>>> having commit access.
>>
>> Um, right.
>>
>> Let's just see how far that reviewer gets if he doesn't have commit access.
>>
>> Whereas a committer lacking review access can still apply the same
>> patches that would be contained in a merge request.
>>
> you can try that exactly once in projects like webkit.

I'm talking about technical capabilities. Policy is something else
entirely. It's nice that webkit does things <whatever way it does it>
but that doesn't mean anything to us.

--Jeff

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-scm-interest/attachments/20091211/a67bc239/attachment.sig