[Kde-scm-interest] meeting summary

[Jeff Mitchell]

On 12/11/2009 2:59 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 08:33:58AM -0500, Jeff Mitchell wrote:
>> In fact, it probably makes sense to put the permission to change merge
>> request statuses into the Committers category (since they have
>> permission to modify the code via pushes, they're the ones that can
>> actually apply the code in the merge requests), 
>>
> no. being a reviewer who may ack patches is a higher privilege than
> having commit access.

Um, right.

Let's just see how far that reviewer gets if he doesn't have commit access.

Whereas a committer lacking review access can still apply the same
patches that would be contained in a merge request.

--Jeff

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-scm-interest/attachments/20091211/641d2f2d/attachment-0001.sig