[Kde-scm-interest] meeting summary

[Chani]

On December 9, 2009 15:48:32 Lydia Pintscher wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 00:36, Oswald Buddenhagen <ossi at kde.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:14:17AM +0100, Lydia Pintscher wrote:
> >> Once all of KDE is on gitorious it will be extremely hard to maintain
> >> the policy of only having these $-developer groups for merge requests
> >> and nothing else. And the more of those groups we create with every
> >> project that moves the bigger the incentive will be to not use
> >> +kde-developers but the smaller group for commit rights.
> >
> > why do you bring +kde-developers in? it is *exactly* the equivalent of
> > having an svn account.
> 
> Well yes. That is exactly my point. We only want +kde-developers to
> commit to "our" code and we want them to have access to all of it, not
> only a part.
> With a lot of those small project groups we give the opportunity to
> give only a small group commit access to a certain part of our code.
> So i'd like us to make two things sure:
> 1) This is only a temporary solution.

+1

> 2) We want everyone in +kde-developers to have commit access to
> everything and only them.

yes; ossi was arguing for this too. :) just to be extra clear, we are *all* in 
agreement that commit rights go through the kde-developers group. it's only 
the method of handling merge request emails that opinions differ on. :)

-- 
This message brought to you by eevil bananas and the number 3.
www.chani3.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-scm-interest/attachments/20091209/a1a140c1/attachment.sig