[Kde-scm-interest] svn, git, bzr
Thiago Macieira
thiago at kde.org
Sat Jul 26 14:15:49 CEST 2008
Riccardo Iaconelli wrote:
>Il Thursday 24 July 2008 02:35:03 Michael Pyne ha scritto:
>> Then if we must track it, how do we do so? I would of course prefer
>> that however it is done, it is as foolproof as possible. So I don't
>> know if manually adding tags to the commit log (like
>> AUTHOR:foo at kdemail.net) is the best, I think making it part of the
>> command itself would be better (i.e. bzr commit-for --author blah).
>
>git commit -s?
What the command above does (which is what the kernel people use) is that
you commit a patch by someone else: the authorship is retained, but you
add a line to the message saying you sign off on it.
For a two-person event, this is not necessary, since the name of the
committer is also kept in the commit message.
However, imagine that, like the kernel, patches flow upstream through the
social network. When a third person uses the same command, the author
name would be retained, but the committer's name would change. The second
committer's (and any other committer who is not the last one) name would
appear only in the message.
For KDE I don't think this would work. We have a fairly flat social
structure and most people can commit to the repositories. Therefore,
since a patch would probably never need to be analysed by more than one
person (besides the author), signing off and other tags would not be
necessary.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-scm-interest/attachments/20080726/af7bf3ae/attachment.pgp
More information about the Kde-scm-interest
mailing list