[Kde-scm-interest] ideas to git conversion

[Thomas Zander]

On Wednesday 3. December 2008 22:46:43 Raul Fernandes wrote:
> I think the repositories should be arranged like linux kernel. The git
> contains only one part of history (I think is 2.5.something to now) and the
> rest of history remains in another server if anyone wants to see the log.

you can still just clone with depth = 1 to get a minimal checkout, no need to 
put stuff on different servers.

This, however, doesn't invalidate Thiago's point that you really do need 
multiple repositories to only get the files you actually work on.

-- 
Thomas Zander
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-scm-interest/attachments/20081204/efd94c5a/attachment.sig