[Kde-scm-interest] Layout of the Git repositories for KDE?(proposal #2)

[Thomas Zander]

On Monday 05 November 2007 19:21:13 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > Personal back-up and personal projects. [...]
>
> i anticipate a lot of confusion in this area. :)
>
> as far as "crazy idea" projects go, people might want to change the
> status of their repo at some point, so they would either move/clone it
> around ('cause there's too little to do ...) or leave it
> "miscategorized". choose your death.

For the various stuff that Thiago suggested for the personal dir I think 
we need to give those users the ability to completely remove a repo at 
the file level.  Via a webform or shell access, for example.

What this means is that a 3th option opens up; I created a new plugin for 
KOffice and after the release I want to move it into the official tree.
This means I have the choice to move my stuff to the koffice.git, or I 
create a new project at the correct place and link to that from that same 
koffice.git.
Either sounds fine to me.

Naturally, I assume we will have a rule that says any code we actually 
will release (i.e. everything under 'stable' from Thiago's mail) has to 
be available under stable as well.  This avoids people linking to 
sourceforge or the users dirs for something the release team should be 
able to make a tarball of at release time.

btw. I really like the latest sugestion, as well as the ideas that Oswald 
added :)
-- 
Thomas Zander
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-scm-interest/attachments/20071105/96df496b/attachment.pgp