FlashQard

Jos Poortvliet jospoortvliet at gmail.com
Wed Sep 24 19:29:55 CEST 2008


On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 7:10 PM, shahab shirazi <shahab.sh.70 at gmail.com>wrote:

> Thanks for your suggestions.
> I'm going to talk to kde-edu team. But, as Anne Marie told me in another
> email, FlashQard is a bit different from Parley. So maybe they can live
> together!
>

Well, even better! You might be able to share some common infrastructure and
for example fileformats, but maintain two different applications...


>
> Shahab.
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Jos Poortvliet <jospoortvliet at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 3:45 PM, shahab shirazi <shahab.sh.70 at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hello everybody!
>>> I'm Shahab, a new member of this mailing list.
>>> I'm the developer of FlashQard project:
>>> http://qt-apps.org/content/show.php/FlashQard?content=80866
>>> Obviously this is an educational software to help user to learn things in
>>> an efficient way using flash cards and Leitner system. Something similar to
>>> Parley. It is also written by C++ and Qt.
>>> Although it is under heavy development, but I think, it currently is even
>>> more advanced than Parley and has more features.
>>> What I'd like to know is:
>>> Is there any chance for this FlashQard to be replaced with Parley?
>>>
>> You should contact the developers of Parley (who are still working on the
>> application) on the KDE edu mailinglist. The KDE Edu developers will have to
>> decide on this. Besides features, there are more conditions for one project
>> to replace another, especially if both are still under heavy development. To
>> name one, your project is currently Qt only, so it offers little integration
>> with KDE (parley offers a plasmoid, to name a very cool thing). Another is
>> long-term viability - a project with more than one developer has a much
>> smaller chance of becoming discontinued, so we generally prefer such a
>> project over another.
>>
>> I would suggest looking for integration and cooperation with Parley as a
>> first option, especially before starting to talk about replacing. I could
>> imagine the Parley developers wouldn't be happy with that suggestion, and
>> you need their approval (as team members of the KDE Edu team) for inclusion.
>> I'm not saying they have such big ego's, but we all like our own work, we're
>> only human. Maybe a merger between the two projects would/could be the best
>> option for all!
>>
>> grtz
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> best regards...
>>> Shahab
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> kde-quality mailing list
>>> kde-quality at kde.org
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-quality
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> kde-quality mailing list
>> kde-quality at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-quality
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> kde-quality mailing list
> kde-quality at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-quality
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-quality/attachments/20080924/6bb4e77b/attachment.htm 


More information about the kde-quality mailing list