A look at GNOME 2.14, comparison to KDE

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On Monday 20 February 2006 20:28, Brendan wrote:
> On Monday 20 February 2006 15:24, Janne Ojaniemi wrote:
> > KDE. And when we do that, we should not be thinking "KDE kicks ass! It's
> > the best desktop there is!". Rather, we should try to think "KDE sucks.
> > It needs loads of work and polishing before it's acceptable!". Why? That
> > way
>
> Isn't that just as dumb?

IMHO, yes.

not only does it sell our current work short and open the door to changing 
things that do not need changing, it's a total moral killer.

> How about "What works?" "What doesn't?" "What's overkill?"

ah, reason!

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

Full time KDE developer sponsored by Trolltech (http://www.trolltech.com)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-quality/attachments/20060221/20cafe44/attachment.pgp