Massive Konqueror Regression

Geoffrey Huang geoff at red8.org
Thu Aug 18 23:50:36 CEST 2005


This seems to contradict what Christian had said.  Just to be clear,
you're suggesting I create a new list specifically for QA issues, right?
The kde-quality list shouldn't get confused with this?

-g

On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 18:37 -0300, Carlos Leonhard Woelz wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 22:39:20 +0200, "Christian Loose"
> <christian.loose at hamburg.de> said:
> > Since JRT said that he is interested in keeping the kde-quality mailing
> > list and use it for QA related discussions 
> > (http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-quality/2005-August/001597.html), it
> > might make sense to coordinate your efforts with the other interested
> > people on that list.
> 
> Please use any name but kde-quality for that. This way we get less
> confusion with the current kde-quality effort.
> 
> Anyway, make sure you select a name that implies that the list is for
> contributors not for random rants. kde-quality is not a good name in
> this sense.
> 
> Suggestions:
> 
> kde-qa-devel
> kde-testing
> kde-test-devel
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Carlos Woelz
> _______________________________________________
> kde-quality mailing list
> kde-quality at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-quality


More information about the kde-quality mailing list