When to set VERIFIED in BugZilla?

[James Richard Tyrer]

Matt Rogers wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 March 2004 05:07 pm, James Richard Tyrer wrote:
> 
>>When should I mark a bug as verified.
>>
>>I have a few bugs that were reported against 3.2 and have now been fixed
>>and backported.  I presume that them will work, but I will check them again
>>when the KDE_3_2_1_RELEASE is built.
>>
>>Should I mark them as VERIFIED when I confirm that they have been fixed in
>>the 3.2.1 release?  and put them on my do do list for future regression
>>testing on 3.3.
>>
>>If so, then when should the bug be marked CLOSED?
>>
>>Or, should I wait till a 3.3 RELEASE tag to test them and mark them
>>VERIFIED?
>>
>>--
>>JRT
> 
> 
> In general, we don't use the VERIFIED resolution in bugzilla because we don't
> have a formal Q & A department. So if it's fixed in KDE 3.2.1, then just
> leave it as resolved and leave it at that.

Hello! :-)  Perhaps we need to discuss this further, but aren't we starting 
a QA department?  Isn't that what we are doing here?

--
JRT