Should we remove poursuivant from #kontact

[Volker Krause]

On Friday, 7 April 2023 22:23:15 CEST Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> On Freitag, 7. April 2023 21:45:04 CEST Carl Schwan wrote:
> > I wonder if we should remove poursuivant from the #kontact irc/matrix
> > channel. It generates a lot of noise and has generally been removed from
> > several kde channels in recent years.
> 
> It depends a bit on the raison d'être of this channel. With the constant
> flood of pursuivant messages the channel is pretty much useless for any
> normal conversation. The occasional user question is quickly drowned and
> most likely missed by most. So, if the channel's purpose isn't the KDE PIM
> commit stream then removing the commit stream is probably the right
> decision.

Right. I don't think that is the intention, or at least it wasn't originally. 
So I agree removing the commit message makes sense (or moving them to a 
dedicated channel if people really want/use them).

Regards,
Volker
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-pim/attachments/20230409/8f580182/attachment.sig>