CI system maintainability

[Kevin Ottens]

Hello,

On Thursday, 28 March 2019 20:35:11 CET Dr.-Ing. Christoph Cullmann wrote:
> I and others tried to get more reviews done in the past, but actually I
> merged more than once stuff that I reviewed but it did break the CI.

That I hope we'll get fixed at some point. It's a big big advantage when you 
can get a CI run on reviews. I find it best when you get both humans and 
scripts looking at the code in a review. It helps a lot in having better 
quality reviews from the humans since they are relieved from the boring 
redundant nitpicking (catching warnings, basic code style, etc.).

Regards.
-- 
Kevin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-pim/attachments/20190329/45939980/attachment.sig>