[Kde-pim] Review Request 123109: Fix assert when ETM is monitoring one specific collection.

[David Faure]

> On April 24, 2015, 7:07 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > Daniel: is this what you had in mind?

Err sorry, I mean Christian :-)


- David


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123109/#review79422
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 29, 2015, 12:32 p.m., David Faure wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123109/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 29, 2015, 12:32 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDEPIM-Libraries and Christian Mollekopf.
> 
> 
> Repository: kdepimlibs
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Since 58af6d2ca8194, this sets it as the root of the model.
> So if the collection itself changes, the associated index is the invalid index.
> 
> REVIEW: 123109
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   akonadi/entitytreemodel_p.cpp 6800a8659e59b36472380d22968c341913a1a5bb 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123109/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> This was asserting, in the test app I'm writing, where the ETM is created with only one specific collection to monitor.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> David Faure
> 
>

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/