[Kde-pim] Review Request 119206: Reply types and forward part in the API.

[Kevin Krammer]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119206/#review62378
-----------------------------------------------------------



mobile/api/mail/composer.cpp
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119206/#comment43332>

    this is not used (yet), right?


- Kevin Krammer


On Juli 15, 2014, 8:11 vorm., Abhijeet Nikam wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119206/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Juli 15, 2014, 8:11 vorm.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDEPIM, Kevin Krammer and Michael Bohlender.
> 
> 
> Repository: kdepim
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> I have added the slots for 4 types of replies and one for forwarding. I am using the slot for retrieving the message from the URL twice.
> 
> I tried a lot, passing the enum value for type of reply eg ( reply ( url, MessageComposer::ReplyAll) ) in the reply slots but failed to do so, so I have declared an enum type and assigned the value to it in the reply slots, in the main composer file.
> 
> Secondly, Is this approach ok ( using the url and using the same code twice for forward and reply ) or should I shift to the present approach of mobile mail, using item id, and Kjob?
> 
> Third thing, without including kdepim in the cmakelists.txt file, it doesn't compile and gives link errors. Any alternative to that?
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   mobile/api/mail/CMakeLists.txt d280d62 
>   mobile/api/mail/composer.h b731287 
>   mobile/api/mail/composer.cpp dc750e8 
>   mobile/api/mail/receivermodel.h b0818aa 
>   mobile/api/mail/receivermodel.cpp 9bc69e8 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119206/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> I got some mixed results with testing. All the functions seem to work fine, but I feel results are not the same as I expected, or maybe I have gone wrong in testing.
> 
> ReplyToAuthor and forwarding works well.
> 
> For 3 recipionts in an email,
> ReplyToMessage - sends a reply to all the 3 recipients in the to field whereas 
> ReplyToAll-> sends the first recipient in the to field, and others as CC.
> 
> Is this how it is supposed to be?
> 
> ReplyToList - when tested with a mailng list ( kdepim's mailing list ) or even a normal mail
> qDebug() -> to filed of the message give a null string. Same message for replyToMessage gives a normal, expected results. Do I need to specify or create a lists for testing? 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Abhijeet Nikam
> 
>

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/