[Kde-pim] Review Request 119468: POC: Fetch tags with item

[Dan Vrátil]

> On July 26, 2014, 2:39 p.m., Dan Vrátil wrote:
> > > TAG "(\"gid1\" \"\" \"\" \"\" \"0\" () () \"-1\")") ))
> > 
> > I'm not very happy about this format. It's more error prone when it comes to extending/changing the format. Using the standard "KEYWORD value" pairs is IMO much better. It also allows skip empty parts.
> 
> Christian Mollekopf wrote:
>     It is "TAG ((tag1) (tag2) ...)", do you prefer "TAG (tag1) TAG (tag2) ..."?

TAG ((tag1) (tag2)) is better I think.


- Dan


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119468/#review63193
-----------------------------------------------------------


On July 25, 2014, 5:48 p.m., Christian Mollekopf wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119468/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 25, 2014, 5:48 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Akonadi.
> 
> 
> Repository: akonadi
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> POC: Fetch tags with item
> 
> Works but is not cleaned up. Please tell me if it looks generally ok, or if you'd like to see some things done differently.
> 
> Example communication:
> 49: QDEBUG : TagTest::testFetchFullTagWithItem() qttest(1354)/libakonadi Akonadi::ItemFetchJob::doStart: "45  UID FETCH 2 EXTERNALPAYLOAD (UID CO
> LLECTIONID FLAGS SIZE REMOTEID REMOTEREVISION TAGS (UID) DATETIME)
> 49: "
> 
> 49: QDEBUG : TagTest::testFetchFullTagWithItem() qttest(1354)/libakonadi Akonadi::ItemFetchJob::doHandleResponse: "*" "2 FETCH (UID 2 REV 1 REMOT
> EID "" MIMETYPE "application/octet-stream" COLLECTIONID 5 SIZE 0 DATETIME "25-Jul-2014 15:46:53 +0000" FLAGS () TAGS ((UID 10 GID "gid1" PARENT 0
>  MIMETYPE "PLAIN" TAG "(\"gid1\" \"\" \"\" \"\" \"0\" () () \"-1\")") ))?
>  
>  The code is in the dev/itemtagfetch branch.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   server/src/handler/fetchscope.h 03fdf8ebff8bfa3c3f914fd7b79080b5758038a8 
>   server/src/handler/fetchscope.cpp a7ebb13205bdb40f724c6c7fdb6c0187de9ae3ba 
>   server/src/handler/tagfetchhelper.h 4c3f9078fc1be909c4c06faaeb9d662fa42885bd 
>   server/src/handler/tagfetchhelper.cpp e01e63920e2afe33a408b7826eb41beffeed368c 
>   server/src/handler/fetchhelper.h 49c51e8b4e813432e3dcdde9badbf196ec0c1a03 
>   server/src/handler/fetchhelper.cpp 079a8984aadbf166023736cd6c9ed55db3c6e9b7 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119468/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Christian Mollekopf
> 
>

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/