[Kde-pim] Problems with infrastructure

[Sebastian Kügler]

[I love our infrastructure, just this bit triggered my reply-to-email reflex]

On Wednesday, December 10, 2014 10:28:59 Christian Mollekopf wrote:
> * deleting branches: This is the only major gripe I have with the kde 
> infrastructure. I think everyone should be able to delete branches (except 
> some blacklisted ones). If I cannot delete my branches when I no longer
> need  them I try to avoid pushing them, which doesn't help. Personal clones
> are not a solution IMO because you have to manage additional remotes. IMO
> the benefits outweigh the danger of someone accidentally deleting someone
> else's branch. Perhaps a naming scheme could be established for such
> branches, such as: dev/$foo or feature/$foo

In Plasma, we usually name branches <username>/<topic>, so for example 
sebas/breakpluginloader. It'd be supersweet if the user who "owns" this branch 
would be able to delete it. I often leave these branches lingering for too 
long before I ask notmart to delete them, so that would be a useful addition.

I quite like not being able to delete arbitrary branches.

Cheers,
-- 
sebas

http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/