[Kde-pim] Review Request 117237: Coding Style for job_p.h

[Guy Maurel]

> On March 31, 2014, 10:34 p.m., David Jarvie wrote:
> > When there was a flood of coding style review requests 3 or 4 weeks ago, you were requested to group multiple files into single reviews. Once again, there are lots of reviews all for individual files, which creates too many emails on the list.

As I make a review I must deal with my reviewer(s).
Kevin and Dan wish a review per file. Please, discuss that with the reviewers. Thanks.


- Guy


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117237/#review54727
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 31, 2014, 4:30 p.m., Guy Maurel wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117237/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 31, 2014, 4:30 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDEPIM-Libraries and Dan Vrátil.
> 
> 
> Repository: kdepimlibs
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This is the second run.
> Details can be seen at:
>   http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Kdepim_Coding_Style
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   akonadi/job_p.h f37739f 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117237/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Guy Maurel
> 
>

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/