[Kde-pim] PIM Sprint: Porting PIM to Frameworks

[Kevin Ottens]

On Sunday 24 November 2013 21:36:02 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Kevin Ottens wrote:
> >> Tiers above 1 are not especially relevant. A tier is a fluid label. It
> >> doesn't matter when we are using split repos.
> > 
> > If you could stop spreading that it'd be nice. It's not because you see no
> > value in tier 2 and 3 distinction that this value doesn't exist.
> 
> I think this is a misunderstanding.
> 
> I wasn't referring to what you are referring to. I'm referring to the idea
> that the tier of a framework can change through its lifetime if it gets
> dependencies etc, and the fact that post-split, there won't be a 'tier N
> folder' for code to be in. The tier will only exist in documentation.

Aaaaah OK! Apologies I totally misunderstood your point, sorry about that.
I probably shouldn't reply to emails during three weeks of non stop work... 
who knew sprints and conferences over week-ends were that draining? :)

Cheers.
-- 
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net

KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-pim/attachments/20131125/6d3beea9/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/