[Kde-pim] Review Request 110304: Remove dead code in VCardLine

[Kevin Krammer]

> On May 4, 2013, 6:59 p.m., Kevin Krammer wrote:
> > Doesn't that change the size of VCardLine?
> 
> Milian Wolff wrote:
>     Yes, thats the whole point. VCardLine is not exported though so it should not matter.

Are you sure? I checked the CMakeLists.txt of the directory and it installs vcardline.h and it is a .h and not a _p.h so I think it is public API.
Maybe the reason d is currently not used is that its need got removed but itself could not due to BC rules?


- Kevin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110304/#review32028
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 4, 2013, 6:55 p.m., Milian Wolff wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110304/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 4, 2013, 6:55 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDEPIM-Libraries.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The private class is not used and the pointer just increases the object size by 8bytes on a 64bit machine.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   kabc/vcardparser/vcardline.h 0cdf52b 
>   kabc/vcardparser/vcardline.cpp 349614e 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110304/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Milian Wolff
> 
>

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/