[Kde-pim] Did we reintroduce some performance issues with KDE 4.10?

[Lailah]

El dom, 03-02-2013 a las 02:48 +0530, Vishesh Handa escribió:

> On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Jos Poortvliet <jos at opensuse.org> wrote:
> 
> > Considering the removing of legacy data, empty tags, duplicate tags,
> > duplicate file metadata, duplicate icons and other cruft the Nepomuk
> > Cleaner
> > is spending hours on removing from my nepomuk database, I'm guessing there
> > is a slightly above-zero gain to be had.
> >
> > I'm quite happy with the nepomuk cleaner: it has led to a HUGE speed
> > increase in KMail, so much that instead of opening all folders I regularly
> > use in tabs I can now just open them on demand, without having to wait well
> > over a minute per folder for them to open.
> >
> > Thanks, Vishesh, and yes, I think it's a good idea to find out if we can
> > somehow, not too intrusively, run this upon a upgrade to a newer version of
> > Nepomuk.
> >
> 
> For me it took a total of 20 hours (not a typo) to migrate all the akonadi
> legacy data. That is one of the main reasons why we just cannot run it on
> an upgrade.
> 
> I suppose we could just throw away all the legacy Nepomuk data. Don't know.
> 


I think it would be better if it just throw away all the old legacy
data....


Just my thought...
Lailah

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-pim/attachments/20130203/f022bde6/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/