[Kde-pim] Nepomuk feeder queuing problem

Milian Wolff mail at milianw.de
Wed Jan 18 18:48:04 GMT 2012


On Wednesday 18 January 2012 01:16:01 Christian Mollekopf wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 January 2012 17.37:19 Michael Jansen wrote:
> > On Monday, January 16, 2012 06:41:33 PM Christian Mollekopf wrote:
> > > Hey Sebastian,
> > > 
> > > I don't see the problem with this as this timer just kickstarts the
> > > processing and can be called as many times as you want. The ItemQueue
> > > does the actual feeding of the data. The processing of the ItemQueue is
> > > triggered by the processItem() function which simply does nothing if
> > > called repeatedly (mRunningJobs > 0). processItem() is also the function
> > > which gets called if you call setOnline() or addItem(), but that
> > > shouldn't hurt as far as I can see.
> > > 
> > > So there should be at maximum two nepomuk jobs running at a time (one
> > > per ItemQueue).
> > > 
> > > Are you sure virtuoso is really going crazy? While indexing virtuoso
> > > takes all the cpu power it can get, but that seems normal to me. Also
> > > the indexing can take veeery long, so it's quite possible that users
> > > think virtuoso just went crazy.
> > 
> > No. I am sometimes sitting besides my desktop working on my laptop and
> > enjoy virtuoso going crazy and stopping by just listening into the fan.
> > So i put a top up and glimpsed over to see what happens.
> > 
> > It will go to 80-180% cpu for some time, then go back to normal, nearly
> > all
> > of the time. It never stops doing that here. Usually i was able to find
> > out
> > 
> >  the culprit by just looking at top. Another process was usually right
> > 
> > behind virtuoso in cpu usage.
> > 
> > We fixed most of these problems.
> > 
> > This time it is different. Only virtuoso does it. Some akonadi process
> > seem
> > to hover at 3-5% for me but not really sure if there is any relation.
> > 
> > I have no clue if it is related. But on session login i enjoy virtuoso,
> > nepomukstorage, kontact and akonadi_nepomukfeeder go onto a minutes long
> > cpu and io burning session. I plan to have a look during the next days
> > what is the reason for that.
> 
> That virtuoso peaks at session start is the same here. However after a
> minute or so everything goes back to normal.
> 
> Note that the feeder doesn't even really use a lot of cpu here when its full
> speed indexing, the load is really generated on virtuoso. You should
> however see if the feeder is active if you open up akonadiconsole (it would
> print which collection it is currently indexing as status message).

Since I always have this issue (virtuoso hogging up one core constantly) I'd 
like to offer my help. If you have any ideas on where I should look or what 
kind of information I should provide, please tell me.

Cheers
-- 
Milian Wolff
mail at milianw.de
http://milianw.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-pim/attachments/20120118/a7af6f88/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/


More information about the kde-pim mailing list