[Kde-pim] Akonadi: single database design mistake?

[Milian Wolff]

On Tuesday 29 November 2011 20:21:42 Anders Lund wrote:
> On Tirsdag den 29. november 2011, Milian Wolff wrote:
> > I understand how this experience is far from optimal, but refrain from
> > spreading such FUD as the above. I also have lots of problems with KMail2
> > but  I actually sit down and try to fix them. Which so far works out
> > pretty well.
> 
> Expressions of worries and frustration is not FUD.
> 
> Not everybody is a developer (though this list is for developers, agreed),
> or wants to develop or debug kmail or akonadi. Does that make us undesired
> as users? Does it mean we can not express our worries?

Granted, I'm in a bad mood and my first mail was too harsh - excuse me.

Nevertheless I still think this discussion is moot.

Bye
-- 
Milian Wolff
mail at milianw.de
http://milianw.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-pim/attachments/20111129/20879cf0/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/