[Kde-pim] Re: KDEPIM 4.6RC2 Tarballs (try #1)

Stephen Kelly steveire at gmail.com
Thu Jun 2 08:41:39 BST 2011


Vishesh Handa wrote:

> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Stephen Kelly <steveire at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Scott Kitterman wrote:
>>
>> > On Monday, May 30, 2011 10:32:57 AM Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
>> >> CC'ing release-team and kde-pim back. The people who can properly
>> >> answer these concerns are not subscribed to kde-packager.
>> >>
>> >> Raymond Wooninck <tittiatcoke at gmail.com> writes:
>> >> > On Monday 30 May 2011 09:40:46 Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> >> >> On Monday, May 30, 2011 09:35:54 AM Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
>> >> >> > CC'ing kde-packager.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Stephen Kelly <steveire at gmail.com> writes:
>> >> >> > > Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
>> >> >> > >> Speaking of SDO, last time I asked about the right version to
>> use
>> >> >> > >> I saw the issue was discussed on kde-core-devel and kde-pim,
>> >> >> > >> but no definitive answer was given to kde-packager. Could you
>> >> >> > >> please summarize the final answer for us?
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > As far as I know, the rcgen code generator in kdelibs master
>> >> >> > > has been
>> >> >> > > changed to generate code that does not break kdepim < 4.7, even
>> >> >> > > after the changes introduced in SDO 0.7.
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > I didn't try it myself since then.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > OK, so KDE SC 4.7 will require SDO 0.7, but will work fine with
>> >> >> > kdepim <= 4.7; KDE SC < 4.7 requires SDO 0.6, which also works
>> >> >> > fine with kdepim <= 4.7?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I hope kdepim 4.6 and kdelibs 4.7 both work with SDO 0.6 or 0.7
>> >> >> (pick one) as we can't use one version for some packages and
>> >> >> another for others.
>> >> >
>> >> > What I know from Trueg is that kdelibs 4.7 has a hard requirement
>> >> > for SDO
>> >> > 0.7. This due to recent changes in kdelibs 4.7.  I know that kdepim
>> >> > in master has been changed to work with SDO 0.7, but I am not sure
>> >> > if these changes ar backwards compatible.
>> >> >
>> >> > So I am afraid that kdepim 4.6 and kdelibs 4.7 are currently a NO-GO
>> >> > combination. (unless kdepim 4.6 has been changed to work with SDO
>> 0.7).
>> >>
>> >> From what I see, rcgen in kdelibs master (upcoming 4.7) has been
>> >> patched so that kdepim < 4.7 also works with it, so it's not a NO-GO.
>> >
>> > I guess the question is has it (kdelibs) been changed to work with SDO
>> > 0.6? If both work with SDO 0.6, then we can stay with that until we get
>> > a SDO 0.7 compatible kdepim release.
>>
>> 2e1704ddfda6ae53ec2793129f2700601ac6f31b in kdelibs increases the
>> requirement there to SDO 0.7. I don't know why. Sebastian Trueg would
>> have to answer that and tell you what it would take to revert.
>>
>> As far as I know, kdepim 4.6 and kdepim 4.7 are SDO 0.7 compatible. Has
>> anyone confirmed the opposite? If both are not 0.7 compatible then that
>> has to be fixed and nobody knows about it.
>>
>>
> I haven't tested it but AFAIK 4.6 should NOT be compatible with SDO 0.7.
> If no one
> objects I can backport the fix to kdelibs 4.6.
> 

I'm confused. What patch are you referring to that could be backported to 
kdelibs? What combination do you say does not work? kdepim4.7 with 
kdelibs4.6?



_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/



More information about the kde-pim mailing list