[Kde-pim] Re: KDEPIM 4.6RC2 Tarballs (try #1)

[Stephen Kelly]

Vishesh Handa wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Stephen Kelly <steveire at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Vishesh Handa wrote:
>>
>> > I haven't tested it but AFAIK 4.6 should NOT be compatible with SDO
>> > 0.7. If no one
>> > objects I can backport the fix to kdelibs 4.6.
>> >
>>
>> I'm confused. What patch are you referring to that could be backported to
>> kdelibs? What combination do you say does not work? kdepim4.7 with
>> kdelibs4.6?
>>
>>
> I'll explain -
> 
> kdelibs contains the Nepomuk rc-gen which kdepim uses to generate C++
> classes for the ontologies. The ontologies are generated by looking at the
> .trig files provided by SDO. From SDO 0.7 we have updated the ontologies,
> and that results in the rc-gen generating C++ classes that do not contain
> certain public member functions.
> 
> I patched up the rc-gen in 4.7 so that it would generate those removed
> member functions ( even though it is not correct from an ontology point of
> view ). kdelibs 4.6 and lower still contain the old rc-gen which would not
> generate all the member functions.
> 
> So, kdelibs 4.6 along with SDO 0.7 will not be compatible with earlier
> releases of KDEPIM. The current kdepim release, rc1 I think, contains
> fixes to not use those removed member functions[1], so that should be
> fine.
> 
> Uhm, this is kinda confusing. I think if I just backport that patch, then
> all permutation combinations should work.
> 
> [1] http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101336/
> 

You and Sebastian figure it out and tell packagers.  

There's no more I can do. I'm just getting more confused because I thought 
the issue was fixed.


_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/