[Kde-pim] Re: Validity of a UserBase page?

[Adrian von Bidder]

Heyho!

On Monday 10 January 2011 20.30:21 Anne Wilson wrote:
> > My opinion: those are historical pages that should be retained for
> > posterity. but should not be part of any pages indicating current
> > information.

In the interest of those who use Google a lot: can pages that are kept for 
archival / historical purposes please (1) be marked as such in big, friendly 
letters and (2) be hidden from search engines?

Researching information about some (more or less fast moving) topics is 
increasingly painful because people post links to outdated pages in forums 
etc, which increases their page rank, and makes it difficult to find current 
information.

cheers
-- vbi

-- 
24h Business Support:
... for example, when one of our products stops working, we'll blame
another vendor within 24 hours.
        -- Scott Adams/Dilbert, 2006-06-13
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-pim/attachments/20110110/d083217d/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/