[Kde-pim] Re: (sysadmin work?)

[Kevin Krammer]

On Friday, 2011-02-11, Marc Deop wrote:
> On Friday 11 February 2011 10:38:44 Thomas McGuire wrote:
> > There is actually a "KMail2" product. In retrospect, it would have been
> > better  to add that as a version to the "KMail"product instead, since
> > having two products is apparently to confusing for reports.
> 
> Well, now that I think about it...makes sense as kmail2 is rewritten almost
> from scratch (AFAIK). However, this brings the kind of situations we are
> talking here.
> 
> > Maybe sysadmin can move all reports from KMail2 to KMail with version
> > "2.0.89"?
> 
> Mmmm this is tricky. Many bug reports for kmail1 should move to akonadi if
> we are talking about kmail2, but stay the same otherwise.
> 
> For example let's check https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67504
> 
> It's a wish for kmail to support imap. Well, kmail1 doesn't support it but
> *akonadi* does (and so does Kmail2).
> 
> Therefore... should we move the wish to akonadi and mark it as "Resolved"
> or should we leave it the same as kmail1 *is* responsible for imap?
> 
> My opinion is that if kmail1 is no longer developed, we should mark those
> bugs as Solved in version 2.
> 
> What do you think of this guys? This might help to reduce the number of
> bugs in kde and the work for the developers.

There is no release of that solution yet, therefore all reports are still 
valid.

Cheers,
Kevin

-- 
Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer
KDE user support, developer mentoring
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-pim/attachments/20110211/33f2577c/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/