[Kde-pim] Re: Kmail' ideas for the GSoC 2011 (sysadmin work?)

[Thomas McGuire]

Hi,

On Friday 11 February 2011 10:29:48 Marc Deop wrote:
> On Thursday 10 February 2011 16:42:12 genomega wrote:
> > This may be the reason.
> > 
> > 2857 bugs found:
> > http://bugs.kde.org/buglist.cgi?product=kmail&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_
> > sta tus=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED
> 
> How many of those are solved in the akonadi version of kmail?
> 
> The first two, for example, are solved... should I start closing bug
> reports?
> 
> By the way, I've found a couple of things wrong on bugzilla:
> 
> 1- The last "Version" for kmail is 1.13.6. Shouldn't it apper kmail2
> already? 2- "Version" gives SVN options. Didn't we already moved to git?
> :)

There is actually a "KMail2" product. In retrospect, it would have been better 
to add that as a version to the "KMail"product instead, since having two 
products is apparently to confusing for reports.
Maybe sysadmin can move all reports from KMail2 to KMail with version 
"2.0.89"?

Regards,
Thomas
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-pim/attachments/20110211/b2cfb4a3/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/