[Kde-pim] Re: lead for GSoC proposal on HTML support to KMail

Sudhendu Roy roythecooldude at gmail.com
Fri Apr 1 18:03:38 BST 2011


Hi,
2011/4/1 Thomas McGuire <mcguire at kde.org>

> Hi,
>
> On Wednesday, March 30, 2011 06:52:18 PM Sudhendu Roy wrote:
> > Me and Torgny Nyblom discussed it on IRC too. Torgny was quiet happy with
> > the idea of preserving the code and add an editor for enriched text. We
> > can/should give user to choose between the type of message
> (plain/enriched)
> > he want to receive. This can be handled by TemplateParser.
>
> What do you mean give the user the choice when receiving a message? The
> sender
>
Sorry for the wrong use of word by me.  I wanted to give user choice between
viewing plain/HTML message.
As presently TemplateParser requests for plain text, thus destroying its
HTML content. Let this implementation be as it is.
But if the user wants to view HTML message, then the TemplateParser will
call for HTML text from the object tree.
Am I going the right way? :)
And as you told me last time that porting of viewer/reader is has already
been done by Torgny. Now I think its not an issue of what user wants to view
:)

> decides on the format, usually it is multipart/alternative, which means it
> includes both HTML and plain text, and the mail client can chose which of
> those to display. KMail already has an option for that.
> We might need some sort of option to disable HTML replies/forwards. Adding
>
I did not get this part of disabling HTML replies/forwards. As in, when
shall user need this option?

> that would be a good opportunity to clean up other HTML-related options.
> The Templateparser should produce a multipart/alternative message with both
> a
> HTML part and a plain text part. I am kinda wondering if we need the
> templateparser to create a temporary message at all, maybe we can change it
> so
> that it directly puts the text into the composer window. I don't know which
> of
> the options would be easier though.
>

> BTW, text/enriched is actually a third type of mail, with rich text
> formatting, though I think nobody really supports it. To avoid confusion,
> say
> HTML instead of enriched :)
>
I'll keep it mind from now on :)

>
> Regards,
> Thomas
>
> _______________________________________________
> KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
> KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/
>
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/



More information about the kde-pim mailing list