[Kde-pim] PIM and Nepomuk performance

[Anne Wilson]

On Tuesday 23 February 2010 18:45:32 Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 February 2010 16:43:21 Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> > Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> > > Here, the performance lag is hardly bearable (on two machines, not the
> > > newest ones, but still new enough, I think). Strigi is off. Top blames
> > > virtuoso-t, AFAICS.
> > 
> > Nope, sorry, it's kontact itself that takes ~50% CPU.
> 
> Mine also became very bad - a real regression.  However, the end is in
> sight. The developer who fixed it in 4.3.98 forgot to backport it to the
> 4.4 release. He has done that now, so we should get the upate with 4.4.1 -
> hopefully not too long now.
> 
Apparently it was a related bug, not the identical one, but the result is the 
same ;-)

Anne
-- 
KDE Community Working Group
New to KDE Software? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-pim/attachments/20100223/b79a269a/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/