[Kde-pim] PIM and Nepomuk performance

[Anne Wilson]

On Tuesday 23 February 2010 16:43:21 Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> > Here, the performance lag is hardly bearable (on two machines, not the
> > newest ones, but still new enough, I think). Strigi is off. Top blames
> > virtuoso-t, AFAICS.
> 
> Nope, sorry, it's kontact itself that takes ~50% CPU.
> 
Mine also became very bad - a real regression.  However, the end is in sight.  
The developer who fixed it in 4.3.98 forgot to backport it to the 4.4 release.  
He has done that now, so we should get the upate with 4.4.1 - hopefully not 
too long now.

Anne
-- 
KDE Community Working Group
New to KDE Software? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-pim/attachments/20100223/94205672/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/