[Kde-pim] Re: Review Request: make it easier to build kdepimlibs

[Ingo Klöcker]

On Wednesday 08 December 2010, Guy Maurel wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> On Tuesday 07 December 2010 19:50:50 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> > Guy Maurel wrote:
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> > > http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6068/
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > > 
> > > Review request for KDE PIM.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Summary
> > > -------
> > > 
> > > As a "newcomer" I try to cmake kdepimlibs, without having build
> > > kdelibs. I get an error about the missing of Nepomuk (correct)
> > > and a link to
> > > 
> > >    http://www.kde.org
> > > 
> > > For a newcomer, it is very difficult from this site to get
> > > anything about "nepomuk"!
> > 
> > I have been confused y this before too. Your patch doesn't seem to
> > work though. I can't see it on review board.
> 
> As the patch is small. I attach it now hier.

Just a tiny remark: Please write Nepomuk with a capital N. I'm not sure 
whether "is part of" would be better than "is a part of".

Apart from those minor spelling/wording issues the patch looks fine.


Regards,
Ingo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-pim/attachments/20101209/b8e5246c/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/