[Kde-pim] Review Request: Don't share code between ItemRetriever and FetchHelper
Volker Krause
vkrause at kde.org
Fri Apr 30 15:37:07 BST 2010
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/3844/#review5331
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it!
The approach is fine, and I can't spot anything wrong in the code either.
- Volker
On 2010-04-29 12:04:28, Milian Wolff wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/3844/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated 2010-04-29 12:04:28)
>
>
> Review request for KDE PIM.
>
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> Further step in separating the ItemRetriever from the FetchHelper.
>
> This help removes the code-sharing between the two in order to have free reign in optimizing the queries.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> /trunk/kdesupport/akonadi/server/src/handler/fetchhelper.cpp 1120559
> /trunk/kdesupport/akonadi/server/src/storage/itemretriever.h 1120559
> /trunk/kdesupport/akonadi/server/src/storage/itemretriever.cpp 1120559
>
> Diff: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/3844/diff
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> ran KMail / akonadiconsole, no difference as expected.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Milian
>
>
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/
More information about the kde-pim
mailing list