[Kde-pim] Git migration status

[David Jarvie]

On Sunday 18 Apr 2010 13:23:28 Sander van Grieken wrote:
> On Sunday 18 April 2010 14:07:10 Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> > On Sunday 18 April 2010, Thomas McGuire wrote:
> > > 1.13 GiB is big, it means I nearly need 100 minutes to clone that.
> > > For me personally, that would be borderline ok, but this might not
> > > be very newbie friendly. What do other developers think about this
> > > size?
> 
> 1.13GB is not big at all IMHO :)
> At least not worth throwing away history for.

I agree.
 
> > > - Splitting off the e35 and e4 branches into their own repo
> > - Splitting the repo into multiple per-application repos.
> 
> I tend to think both. And also, anything before the start of the KDE4 branch can go in a 
> separate kde3 repo, from which the new repo 'kde4' branches off. From my limited knowledge 
> of git, that should be possible..

Or why not retain a read-only SVN repository, either up to the date of the switch to git, or just a KDE 3 one. That would retain the history perfectly.

-- 
David Jarvie.
KDE developer.
KAlarm author -- http://www.astrojar.org.uk/kalarm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-pim/attachments/20100418/9765245e/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/