[Kde-pim] Bilbo Blogger, A replacement for KBlogger

Tom Albers toma at kde.org
Tue Sep 8 18:40:30 BST 2009


Op Tuesday 08 September 2009 19:23 schreef u:
> On Sunday 06 September 2009 8:08:57 pm Mehrdad Momeny wrote:
> > On Monday 07 September 2009 04:17:47 am Allen Winter wrote:
> > > On Saturday 05 September 2009 3:08:29 pm Mehrdad Momeny wrote:
> > > > Hi KDE PIM guys,
> > > >
> > > > How is going!? :D
> > > >
> > > > I am one of Bilbo Blogger developers, I was in touch with Christian
> > > > Weilbach, maintainer of KBlog and KBlogger, about some bugs of kblog
> > > > since some months ago...
> > > >
> > > > And we have talked about replacing kblogger with Bilbo in kdepim, as as
> > > > he has given up working on it, and Bilbo is fully functional now, and we
> > > > released it's 1.0 version yesterday.
> > > >
> > > > Currently we use a fork of KBlog and call it BilboKBlog, that contains
> > > > our fixes and new features for KBlog, that most of them have been merged
> > > > back to KBlog until now. And after moving bilbo to kdepim, we should of
> > > > course use kblog and work on it.
> > > >
> > > > There may be some problems on accepting Bilbo in KDEPIM, I want to
> > > > disscuse about them, before importing source into playground, Such as, Do
> > > > you accept another app to sit down on KBlogger place, as I know there are
> > > > many works already done for it, and Is there any properties that an app
> > > > should have to be part of kdepim!?
> > > > And the name, some guys told me that it should be changed! :-/
> > > >
> > > > Source code is here: http://gitorious.org/bilbo
> > > > Its official website: http://bilbo.gnufolks.org/
> > > 
> > > I would be very happy to see a blogging application become part of the
> > >  kdepim module. In fact, we have had this on the feature plan for a long
> > >  time now .
> > > 
> > > KBlogger never became part of kdepim.  So that's not an issue.
> > > 
> > > We don't care about the name -- unless Bilbo tramples on trademarks or
> > >  copyrights.
> > > 
> > > We do have requirements about having an application handbook and to keep
> > > your code "krazy clean".
> > > 
> > > Other than that.. I'm happy to have your commit in trunk/KDE/kdepim
> > >  whenever you're ready. Oh.. we don't use git yet..
> > > 
> > > -Allen
> > > KDEPIM module coordinator
> > > 
> > 
> > ?Very good Allen, I will check for name before importing src into playground.
> > And I know that we have to use git-svn (I'm already developer of choqok ;) )
> > 
> Why playground?
> Why not directly into trunk/KDE/kdepim?

Nothing should go there directly. 
kdereview.

Toma
-- 
KDE Developer
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/


More information about the kde-pim mailing list