[Kde-pim] GSoC Proposal Draft

[Kevin Krammer]

On Monday 23 March 2009, Carter Dewey wrote:

> Thank you for the feedback. I've attached a revised proposal with firmer
> dates for the project outline. If anyone has other criticisms or
> comments, please let me know! If not, then I will probably give this
> another look in a few days to make sure that I'm content with the
> grammar/organization of the proposal, then go ahead and put in my
> application.

Since the timeline is not evenly split, i.e. there is more time before the 
mid-term evaluation than between mid-term and end evaluation, it makes sense 
to put the larger task into the first "half", in your case the application 
port, which is what you did.

However, it might be  more difficult to test the modifications if you don't 
have BasKet data available in Akonadi to test with.

I recommend checking with the application maintainers what there estimates are 
regarding refactoring data I/O into a shared library (unless that is already 
the case). This is essential for application and resource to shared the same 
basic data handling functionality.
This might be a worthy additional milestone before the mid-term evaluation.

Cheers,
Kevin

-- 
Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer
KDE user support, developer mentoring
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-pim/attachments/20090324/6b2f758a/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/